Return to the VTRC Home Page
Click here to print the printer friendly version of this page.
Page Title: VTRC Report Detail

The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s), who is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Commonwealth Transportation Board, or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Any inclusion of manufacturer names, trade names, or trademarks is for identification purposes only and is not to be considered an endorsement.


Use of Neoprene Pads in Testing Concrete Cylinders: Final Report
H. Celik Ozyildirim
H. Celik Ozyildirim
Year: 1982
VTRC No.: 82-R58
Abstract: This study investigated the feasibility of using neoprene pads confined by steel end caps instead of sulfur-mortar caps in compressive strength tests on concrete cylinders. The 1/2 in. (13 mm) thick neoprene pads had a 50 durometer hardness and were cut to fit in the end caps, which had an inside diameter of 6-1/4 in. (159 mm) with a tolerance of +0 and -1/16 in. (-2 mm). Compressive strength data were obtained from 438 pairs of cylinders prepared in the field from commercial batches of concrete. One cylinder of each pair was tested with neoprene pads and the other with sulfur-mortar caps. Although the results indicate statistically significant differences in the values obtained by the two capping methods, the differences are considered negligible from a practical standpoint. A linear regression analysis indicated a good correlation between the two methods.