Return to the VTRC Home Page
Click here to print the printer friendly version of this page.
Page Title: VTRC Report Detail

The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s), who is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Commonwealth Transportation Board, or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Any inclusion of manufacturer names, trade names, or trademarks is for identification purposes only and is not to be considered an endorsement.


Evaluation of Ultra-High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete
H. Celik Ozyildirim
H. Celik Ozyildirim
Year: 2011
VTRC No.: 12-R1

Recently, a new ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHPC) was introduced into construction.  The fibers in UHPC provide tensile capacity across cracks, resulting in high shear capacity in bending members.  Typically, additional reinforcement for shear is not required.

The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is experimenting with UHPC to determine the possibility of using it in transportation structures.  The first bridge in Virginia to use UHPC beams was the bridge on Route 624 over Cat Point Creek in Richmond County.  The specified minimum 28-day compressive strength was 23 ksi and the specified maximum water–cementitious material ratio was 0.2.  UHPC with high strength and very low permeability was used in five beams in one of the 10 spans of the bridge.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of UHPC in the Route 624 Bridge.  This was achieved by (1) observing the casting of UHPC beams; (2) evaluating the material properties of the UHPC; (3) testing a test beam to failure; (4) measuring strains in beams; and (5) noting any deck cracking.

The results of the study indicated that the use of the UHPC led to very high strength and high durability attributable to a very low water-cementitious material ratio, low permeability, high resistance to cycles of freezing and thawing, and very tight cracks under load, all of which should provide for a much longer service life compared to the use of conventional concrete.  However, because of the high cost of UHPC, more efficient shapes, design requirements, and material and construction specifications need to be developed to make UHPC practical for beams and other uses.  The study recommends that UHPC be considered for use in closure pours and beams with optimized cross sections.