Return to the VTRC Home Page
Click here to print the printer friendly version of this page.
 
Page Title: VTRC Report Detail

The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s), who is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Commonwealth Transportation Board, or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Any inclusion of manufacturer names, trade names, or trademarks is for identification purposes only and is not to be considered an endorsement.

Title:

Centerline Pavement Markings on Two-lane Mountain Highways: Volume 2
Authors:
Saito, Mitsuru.
Nicholas J. Garber
Year: 1983
VTRC No.: 84-R9
Abstract: The Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation uses a lane marking designated mountain pavement marking (MPM) on two-lane highways in mountainous areas. This special marking consists of a single broken yellow line supplemented with "PASS WITH CAUTION" signs. The standard Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) passing and no-passing zones are not marked, with the result that passing maneuvers are not prohibited even when sight distances are inadequate for prevailing speeds. This practice has been criticized by the Federal Highway Administration, highway safety officials, and motorists. Consequently, the Research Council undertook a study to evaluate this centerline marking pattern. The evaluation adopted was made in the form of a before and after study. The before study entailed a literature review, a questionnaire survey of motorists and officials of other states, the recording of passing maneuvers at different sites using a movie camera, the collecting of data on traffic characteristics, and an analysis of accident data. The information obtained on passing maneuvers was then used to develop guidelines on minimum lengths of passing zones and minimum sight distances. The after study entailed the collection and analysis of data on passing maneuvers and traffic characteristics at sites marked with the MUTCD marking patterns based on the guidelines developed. It was determined that traffic characteristics do not significantly change when centerline markings are changed from MPM to the standard MUTCD marking and that the minimum passing zones and passing sight distances given in the MUTCD are inadequate for safe passing maneuvers. It was also determined that the minimum sight distances discretionally used in Virginia are too conservative. The data collected on passing maneuvers during the after study showed that the guidelines developed for minimum passing zones and sight distances are adequate for passing maneuvers on two-lane highways in mountainous areas.