Return to the VTRC Home Page
Click here to print the printer friendly version of this page.
Page Title: VTRC Report Detail

The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s), who is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Commonwealth Transportation Board, or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Any inclusion of manufacturer names, trade names, or trademarks is for identification purposes only and is not to be considered an endorsement.


A Field Investigation of Concrete Overlays Containing Latex, Silica Fume, or Pyrament Cement
H. Celik Ozyildirim
H. Celik Ozyildirim
Year: 1996
VTRC No.: 96-R23
Abstract: This study evaluated latex-modified concretes (LMC) and concretes containing silica fume (SFC) or Pyrament-blended cement (PBCC) in bridge deck overlays in the field. The condition of the overlays was monitored for 4 years. LMC and SFC were placed in 2 days using a vibratory roller screed spanning half the width of the bridge, each side in 1 day. PBCC was placed in small segments, each covering half the width of the bridge, in 2 months. The placement in small segments was dictated by traffic control requirements. PBCC was used with no admixtures. Similarly, LMC was used with no admixture except the latex-modifier. The results indicate that LMC, SFC, and PBCC have low permeability and satisfactory strengths. PBCC develops high very early strengths within hours, even in cold weather, and SFC develops sufficient compressive strength for opening to traffic in 1 day. Since all three concretes are prone to plastic shrinkage, proper and immediate curing are essential.